Public research-facing screening environment

Test new element theories with a clear scientific workflow.

The Periodic Discovery Tool helps researchers, students, and scientifically curious visitors organize a possible element hypothesis, visualize a target-projectile fusion route, and review whether the idea looks physically worth deeper investigation. The main focus is the tool itself, the scientific method, and the open explanation of how a discovery claim should be approached.

This website is a public scientific screening and education platform. It does not claim official discovery status for any element. Formal recognition of a new element depends on high-quality experimental evidence and international validation.
Interactive scientific workflow Fusion-route visualization
119?
Uue
temporary candidate
Target nucleus Bk-249 Heavy target reference
Projectile Ti-50 Beam candidate
Candidate route 119 → 296 Fusion then neutron evaporation
Current confirmed frontierElement 118
Main frontier targets119 & 120
Primary aimEvidence-first screening
Visual discovery path Target + beam → candidate
Live findings panel Method + plain-language explanation
Focused experience Tool-first interface The interactive discovery workflow stays at the center of the site.
Scientific framing Evidence before claims Every result is presented as a screening outcome, not a formal discovery claim.
Creator context Theory evolution included The creator story and interdisciplinary theory now live on the same page.
Main feature

The Periodic Discovery Tool

Use the simplified Start → Stop → Save sequence. The tool runs a default public demonstration route, visually shows the nuclei being combined, and updates the live findings document on the page.

Ready to start

The run sequence visualizes how the proposed nuclei combine, form an excited compound nucleus, and resolve into a candidate isotope.

Idle
Target nucleus
Bk-249
Z=97 • A=249
+
Projectile
Ti-50
Z=22 • A=50
Compound nucleus
Z119 A299
excited fused state
Neutron evaporation
−3n
cooling pathway
Candidate isotope
Uue-296
Z=119 • A=296
50

Organize for deeper review

This idea needs a structured reaction path, literature cross-checking, and experimental realism before it would be worth expert review.

Live Findings Document

The findings document updates on the page. It explains the proposed discovery method, the plain-language meaning of the result, and a theoretical path to recreating the needed environment. It never discusses hidden implementation details.

Open Archive
Why new elements matter

Highlighting the frontier of the periodic table

New elements are not only additions to a chart. They test nuclear theory, probe the limits of matter, help scientists study shell effects and stability, and deepen our understanding of how extreme nuclei behave.

Element 118 is the confirmed frontier

Oganesson, atomic number 118, is the heaviest confirmed element. That makes 119 and 120 the most visible next targets for extending the table into an eighth period.

Confirmed up to Z=118119 unresolved120 unresolved

Why 119 and 120 matter

These candidates sit at the doorway to a new period. Even a tiny number of verified decay-chain events could reshape how chemists and nuclear physicists think about the far edge of the table.

8th period frontiersuperheavy research

Island of stability question

One of the most important open questions is whether shell effects may create relatively longer-lived superheavy nuclei. Discovery work helps test that possibility.

shell effectsstabilitydecay chains
Scientific context

Scientific data that frames the search

This website presents concise, public-facing context so visitors understand what makes an element hypothesis plausible, difficult, or likely to fail under experimental scrutiny.

Key scientific signals

SignalWhy it matters
Charge balanceThe target and projectile proton counts must add up to the candidate element’s atomic number.
Mass balanceThe total mass number must support a credible compound nucleus and a realistic neutron-evaporation path.
Decay chainsNew-element claims typically rely on short sequences of correlated decays matched against known daughter behavior.
Half-life windowThe isotope must live long enough to leave a measurable signal, even if only for milliseconds.
Shell effectsMagic or near-magic proton and neutron numbers may improve survival odds in very heavy nuclei.
Production probabilityCross sections can be extraordinarily small, which is why new elements are so difficult to produce and confirm.

Reference facts for visitors

  • The currently confirmed periodic table extends through element 118.
  • Temporary systematic names and symbols are used before a discovery claim is formally validated and named.
  • Superheavy discovery work often uses fusion-evaporation reactions: a heavy target nucleus is struck by a lighter projectile beam to form an excited compound nucleus.
  • That excited nucleus can cool by ejecting one or more neutrons, leaving a candidate isotope.
  • Formal recognition requires more than prediction: it requires reproducible, high-quality evidence that stands up to international review.
Scientific caution matters. A promising screening result means “worth discussing,” not “discovered.”
Current global projects

Institutions pushing the frontier

New-element work is international and facility-dependent. The projects below represent major centers and collaborations involved in superheavy-element or adjacent rare-isotope research.

RIKEN Nishina Center (Japan)

RIKEN has invested in upgraded superheavy-element research infrastructure, including separator capability aimed at new superheavy synthesis. It is widely viewed as one of the most visible efforts targeting element 119.

Japanelement 119 focusGARIS/GARIS-III

JINR SHE Factory (Dubna)

The Superheavy Element Factory at JINR supports high-intensity heavy-ion research aimed at the synthesis and study of very heavy nuclei, including long-term ambitions for elements 119 and 120.

DubnaDC-280SHE Factory

GSI / FAIR (Germany)

GSI and the FAIR research environment remain important to heavy-ion physics and future superheavy studies, including work that supports the wider search for extreme nuclei.

Germanyheavy-ion physicsfuture SHE relevance

FRIB (United States)

FRIB is a leading rare-isotope facility. While its primary mission is broader than element 119 or 120 alone, it contributes essential data, isotope discoveries, and nuclear-structure insight relevant to frontier element science.

USArare isotopesnuclear structure

ORNL / UTK collaborations

Oak Ridge and university collaborators have participated in research aimed at the synthesis of new superheavy elements and the design of detection systems needed to identify them.

USA collaborationdetection systems

GANIL / SPIRAL2 (France)

French accelerator development also contributes to the wider heavy-ion landscape, including capabilities relevant to beams used in superheavy-element research planning.

Francebeam developmentfuture competitiveness
System of discovery

How the discovery system works

The website explains the system openly at the scientific-method level. It does not discuss hidden implementation details. Visitors can see the reasoning path from hypothesis to screening outcome.

1. Define the candidate

Choose a proton count and neutron count. This determines the identity of the proposed element and isotope.

2. Propose a fusion route

Specify a target nucleus and a projectile beam that, when combined, could theoretically form the candidate after neutron evaporation.

3. Check physical balance

The system checks whether charge and mass are organized sensibly enough to discuss as a plausible route.

4. Compare with stability clues

The screening considers shell proximity, neutron-to-proton balance, binding-energy behavior, and a simple fissility view to estimate how strained the nucleus may be.

5. Think like an experimentalist

The system asks whether the idea includes decay-chain expectations, half-life thinking, and enough evidence planning to make the theory testable.

6. Write the findings plainly

The final findings document explains the result in plain language, tells the user what the proposed pathway means, and outlines the type of laboratory environment theoretically needed to test it.

Official discovery is not declared here. Real discovery depends on measured evidence, peer-level scrutiny, and international validation standards such as those coordinated by IUPAC/IUPAP.
Partial theory testing

Check nuclear data with NuDat 3

Use NuDat 3 from the National Nuclear Data Center to compare known nuclides, decay modes, half-lives, levels, gamma data, and other nuclear-structure information.

NuDat 3 reference check

After running the tool, compare the candidate isotope and expected daughter products against known nuclear data.

What to compare

  • Known isotopes near the proposed candidate.
  • Expected daughter nuclei after alpha decay or spontaneous fission.
  • Half-life windows and decay modes.
  • Whether the route conflicts with evaluated nuclear data.
Saved discoveries

Discovery Archive

Saved and downloaded discoveries are stored locally in this browser. Re-download previous findings from this archive.

Archived element theories

No archived discoveries yet.

No saved discoveries yet. Start the tool, then save the run.
Creator and theory evolution

Marcus Perkins — veteran, independent learner, and STEM-focused creator

Marcus Perkins is a U.S. Navy Veteran and lifelong independent learner. With only a high school education, he has continued studying in his spare time, building his understanding through curiosity, discipline, and a steady interest in nature, mathematics, science, and how STEM fields intersect.

A short creator story

Marcus Perkins brings a practical, hands-on background shaped by service in the U.S. Navy and years of self-directed learning. His military experience strengthened his respect for systems, discipline, precision, and accountability. Those same traits carried into his personal studies and creative work.

Although his formal education stopped at the high school level, he never stopped learning. In his spare time, he studies ideas across science, nature, mathematics, technology, and problem-solving, using curiosity as the engine for continued growth.

Learning beyond the classroom

This project reflects the path of someone who keeps learning without waiting for permission. Marcus studies STEM-related subjects independently, asks questions, compares patterns, and looks for connections between fields that are usually treated separately.

The focus is not on claiming credentials. The focus is on disciplined curiosity: asking better questions, testing ideas carefully, and building tools that make complex theories easier to think through.

Nature, STEM, and intersectional thinking

Marcus is especially interested in how nature expresses structure: symmetry, growth, cycles, balance, decay, force, energy, and transformation. Those ideas appear across biology, chemistry, physics, mathematics, and engineering.

The Periodic Discovery Tool grew from that interest in intersections. It asks whether patterns from one field can help organize questions in another field, especially when thinking about atoms, elements, equations, and discovery pathways.

How the theory evolved

Questioning AI about mathematical overlap

The starting point was repeated questioning about whether the cross section of mathematical equations could be mapped onto atoms and used to compare relationships between different scientific fields.

Mapping equations onto atomic thinking

The theory then explored whether equations could be viewed through atomic-style properties: interaction, structure, balance, transformation, and compatibility.

Conceptual fusion of equations

This led to the idea that equations with similar properties could conceptually fuse, producing new interdisciplinary equations or revealing relationships that were not obvious when each field was studied alone.

Applying the framework to element discovery

That broader thinking was redirected toward the periodic table, creating a public tool that visually organizes possible element-discovery pathways and explains them in plain language.

Guiding philosophy

Patterns can inspire discovery, but evidence must decide it. The purpose of the site is to support organized scientific thinking, not unsupported claims. The tool keeps the scientific method at the center by focusing on hypothesis testing, visual discovery paths, falsification, and plain-language explanation.

Contact

Contact the creator

Use the form below to send questions, collaboration inquiries, or feedback about the public scientific framework.

What this website is designed to do

  • Help users organize a new element theory.
  • Promote scientific-method thinking.
  • Show which nuclei are being combined in the proposed pathway.
  • Explain, in plain language, what the candidate result means.
  • Point visitors toward the international scientific context of discovery.

To personalize the contact flow, replace the default contact email before publishing the site.

Public-facingResearch communicationEducational